LS.com homepage  •   LS.com FAQ  •   Resources
In the media  •   Articles  •   WIKI
It is currently 24 May 2013, 21:55

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


This is the one of the guest-viewable discussion areas. If you haven't already, sign up as a user (everything is, and always will be, completely free)! Users can engage in discussion in both guest-viewable and member-only subforums. There's also an arcade.

Please post in good faith. We support freedom of speech here but deliberately inflammatory posts will be deleted. Use common sense when writing posts and be sure to read the guidelines (and weep) before posting.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2012, 22:08 
Offline
Elite Contributor

Joined: 28 Aug 2011, 17:55
Posts: 2359
Thanks: 979
Thanked:
219 times in 163 posts
Quote:
Attachment Styles, or Comfort with Intimacy, Influence How People Behave

When trying to make sense of our close relationships, it also helps to understand how people form romantic attachments to each other.

To begin with, people differ in their comfort with intimacy in a very predictable manner.

Different Styles of Attachment

Briefly, the way we form an attachment to our romantic partners is based upon the kind of care we received as an infant. And as infants, we typically form an attachment to our primary caregiver, in one of three ways.

Please note, this page draws on the work of Bartholomew, Bowlby, Shaver and Hazan's work on attachment styles and Cole and Leet's review of research on attachment styles.

As Children

When caregivers are consistently available and responsive, infants form a secure style of attachment (also see, Ainsworth). By and large, secure children feel safe and comfortable, and are able to explore and develop new skills with minimal anxiety or concern.

When caregivers are inconsistent or overly protective, however, infants form an anxious or preoccupied attachment to the person primarily responsible for their care. Anxious or preoccupied children monitor their caregivers more closely, attempt to stay by their caregiver’s side and respond more dramatically when in trouble. Anxious children are simply more fearful and less confident than infants who are securely attached.

Finally, if caregivers are neglectful, infants are likely to develop a dismissing style of attachment. Dismissing children show few signs of needing their caregivers, they do not spend a lot of time trying to get their caregiver’s attention, and they do their best to cope with problems on their own.

As Adults

When we fall in love as an adult, the style of attachment formed as an infant influences how we treat our romantic partners.

People who formed a secure attachment to their caregivers tend to form a secure attachment to the person they love.

Individuals with a secure style of attachment have more satisfying and longer lasting relationships. Secure individuals are comfortable being close to their partners. They are comfortable having someone depend on them just as they are comfortable being dependent on another individual. Being more trusting, open, and understanding, they approach problems and issues that may arise with their partners in a constructive manner.

People who formed an anxious or preoccupied attachment as an infant, by comparison, are more likely to be preoccupied with their relationships as an adult. Anxious or preoccupied adults are constantly worried and anxious about their love life - they crave and desperately need intimacy - but, they never stop questioning their partner’s love (“do you really love me?”). Anxious individuals are concerned that their partners will leave them. These adults are obsessed with their relationships and everything that happens in them. They rarely feel completely loved and they experience extreme emotional highs and lows. One minute their romantic partner can make their day by showing them the smallest level of interest and the next minute they are worried that their partner doesn’t care about them. Overall, anxiously attached individuals are hard to satisfy; you can’t love them enough, or be close enough to them, and they constantly monitor their relationships for problems. Ironically, their need for love, makes it easy for anxious individuals to be taken advantage of when it comes to love and romance, which in the long run can create even more suspicion and doubt.

Finally, people who had a dismissing style of attachment as an infant are likely to form a dismissing attachment to their romantic partners. As adults, dismissing individuals are uncomfortable with intimacy - they actually fear it. They do not like it when people get close, and they don’t like being dependent on a partner or having someone be dependent on them. Dismissing individuals tend not to trust others, and they are more self-sufficient, cynical, and independent in nature. They are less likely to fall deeply in love and need a lot less affection and intimacy. Dismissing individuals are more apt to put their time into their careers, hobbies, and activities than their relationships. They also get easily annoyed with their relational partners and often display negative feelings and hostility toward their loved ones.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank Odalis for the above post:
The_woman
PostPosted: 06 Oct 2012, 18:47 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 09 May 2012, 15:40
Posts: 854
Thanks: 123
Thanked:
75 times in 67 posts
Attachemnet theory is getting very much validation through neuroscience these days.

There are actually two other attactement styles aswell

I am totally certain that LoveShyness has to do with rejection during this childhood state. Because People who have a secure attachement style approach with confidence, we do not.

I am certain it's a learnet response not to approach at all.

Odalis, was it you who described yourself as "shoot first ask later" when approached, I think I remember a scen from a movie. Have I got i wrong in that regard?

_________________
Image

Odalis wrote:
Everyone go back to being jealous of prison rape (because they are getting some and you are not), sigh, I wish I were exaggerating.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2012, 20:10 
Offline
Elite Contributor

Joined: 28 Aug 2011, 17:55
Posts: 2359
Thanks: 979
Thanked:
219 times in 163 posts
I don't think I've ever said "shoot first ask later" but I wish to better apply "its easier to ask for forgiveness than permission." A lot of my issues were learned through positive and negative enforcement.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2012, 20:18 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 09 May 2012, 15:40
Posts: 854
Thanks: 123
Thanked:
75 times in 67 posts
Odalis wrote:
I don't think I've ever said "shoot first ask later" but I wish to better apply "its easier to ask for forgiveness than permission." A lot of my issues were learned through positive and negative enforcement.


I don't follow, could you elaborate.

I actually believe Love Shyness it taught by punishment of the inborn drive to attache to others. Not necesserily by cruelnes but by indifference to the childs attemt to make someone attache to their reaching out, but yes you are right passivitty is reinforced positive, and the mother gives her love back when the child acts accordingly to her needs rather than to its own. You are right of course.

_________________
Image

Odalis wrote:
Everyone go back to being jealous of prison rape (because they are getting some and you are not), sigh, I wish I were exaggerating.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2012, 00:38 
Offline
David Icke
User avatar

Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 02:05
Posts: 4901
Location: US
Thanks: 1372
Thanked:
851 times in 603 posts
The_woman wrote:
I actually believe Love Shyness it taught by punishment of the inborn drive to attache to others.

There are so many different types of love shyness that there's not a really a point to try and figure out the ultimate "thing" that causes it. It's really annoying each time you come up with a new theory as to why people are love shy, because it usually only accounts for a small portion of people who are actually love shy. There are so many other variables to take into account.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2012, 14:13 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 09 May 2012, 15:40
Posts: 854
Thanks: 123
Thanked:
75 times in 67 posts
Edge wrote:
The_woman wrote:
I actually believe Love Shyness it taught by punishment of the inborn drive to attache to others.

There are so many different types of love shyness that there's not a really a point to try and figure out the ultimate "thing" that causes it. It's really annoying each time you come up with a new theory as to why people are love shy, because it usually only accounts for a small portion of people who are actually love shy. There are so many other variables to take into account.


I don't really cares what annoys you if it leads me to help LS guys get better and to be able to date. Maybe it's a subgroup I am helping, but in any case it's an improvement

My score so far = 3

_________________
Image

Odalis wrote:
Everyone go back to being jealous of prison rape (because they are getting some and you are not), sigh, I wish I were exaggerating.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group