LS.com homepage  •   LS.com FAQ  •   Resources
In the media  •   Articles  •   WIKI
It is currently 22 May 2013, 00:38

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


This is the one of the guest-viewable discussion areas. If you haven't already, sign up as a user (everything is, and always will be, completely free)! Users can engage in discussion in both guest-viewable and member-only subforums. There's also an arcade.

Please post in good faith. We support freedom of speech here but deliberately inflammatory posts will be deleted. Use common sense when writing posts and be sure to read the guidelines (and weep) before posting.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 23 May 2012, 18:03 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7544
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 548
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
shadowshelf wrote:
Fonduman wrote:
shadowshelf wrote:
Fonduman wrote:
Stranger1983 wrote:
fat, bisexual attention whores, or ultra liberal femme-tards.



yep, that summarises the site.

they all think they're so unique and precious and special and intelligent :lol:


some of you guys on this site are pretty picky for being so desperate...

it's not like you'd have to find someone to marry, it's just a date.

of course, I'm too shy to put a picture up and create a profile in the first place, but if I wasn't, by golly... I'd go out with the fattest, most bisexual attention whoring femme-tard on the site.


i'm not desperate, i'm LS. I choose who deserves my affection with great care. in any case, you're missing the point. I was making fun of how picky they are. it doesn't matter if we were more lenient, because they think they are goddesses. they expect a guy to be tall, good looking, rich, confident, entertaining and educated before even considering him. and even then, they'd probably set him a bunch of tests to pass.


yeah, because they can.

when 100% of the guys want only the top tier females, they're going to force us to compete. the way around that is to go for the girls no one else wants...


several problems with that.
they all think they're top tier, but aren't close. that's the hilarious part.
there are very few girls no one else wants. maybe less than 1% of all girls have trouble getting dsr.
then there's the fact that being able to doesn't justify it. I could kill my all my neighbours easily. not going to :lol:
and the competing itself is on the basis of incredibly superficial traits. i'm picky about selecting for good people. they're picky about selecting for a valuable commodity. see the difference? pickiness is good when it encourages humility, altruism, empathy and intimacy. the girls on these sites deserve ridicule. they need it, they're getting out of control, and they hurt themselves, too. few people can be happy the way they operate, and a plethora of research supports the notion that rising numbers of girls now feel empty and unfulfilled, despite the free bounty of superficial pleasure they have been given access to.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 24 May 2012, 18:44 
Offline
New Poster
User avatar

Joined: 07 May 2012, 05:54
Posts: 28
Location: USA
3 times in 3 posts
Fonduman wrote:
shadowshelf wrote:
Fonduman wrote:
shadowshelf wrote:
Fonduman wrote:

yep, that summarises the site.

they all think they're so unique and precious and special and intelligent :lol:


some of you guys on this site are pretty picky for being so desperate...

it's not like you'd have to find someone to marry, it's just a date.

of course, I'm too shy to put a picture up and create a profile in the first place, but if I wasn't, by golly... I'd go out with the fattest, most bisexual attention whoring femme-tard on the site.


i'm not desperate, i'm LS. I choose who deserves my affection with great care. in any case, you're missing the point. I was making fun of how picky they are. it doesn't matter if we were more lenient, because they think they are goddesses. they expect a guy to be tall, good looking, rich, confident, entertaining and educated before even considering him. and even then, they'd probably set him a bunch of tests to pass.


yeah, because they can.

when 100% of the guys want only the top tier females, they're going to force us to compete. the way around that is to go for the girls no one else wants...


several problems with that.
they all think they're top tier, but aren't close. that's the hilarious part.
there are very few girls no one else wants. maybe less than 1% of all girls have trouble getting dsr.
then there's the fact that being able to doesn't justify it. I could kill my all my neighbours easily. not going to :lol:
and the competing itself is on the basis of incredibly superficial traits. i'm picky about selecting for good people. they're picky about selecting for a valuable commodity. see the difference? pickiness is good when it encourages humility, altruism, empathy and intimacy. the girls on these sites deserve ridicule. they need it, they're getting out of control, and they hurt themselves, too. few people can be happy the way they operate, and a plethora of research supports the notion that rising numbers of girls now feel empty and unfulfilled, despite the free bounty of superficial pleasure they have been given access to.


this seems like a thorough and educated response.

however... isn't it safe to assume that the girls on dating sites represent an accurate sample of women IRL? in other words, if the women in this microcosm don't exhibit humility, altruism, or empathy, how can we assume that offline women do? maybe these girls are just more open about it... when you meet a girl IRL and get to know her, she may turn out to be the same way.

so maybe ALL women deserve ridicule? or, alternately, none of them do, because that's just the way women are?

_________________
"I could have been wild, and I could have been free, but nature played this trick on me..."


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 24 May 2012, 19:01 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7544
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 548
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
shadowshelf wrote:

this seems like a thorough and educated response.

however... isn't it safe to assume that the girls on dating sites represent an accurate sample of women IRL? in other words, if the women in this microcosm don't exhibit humility, altruism, or empathy, how can we assume that offline women do? maybe these girls are just more open about it... when you meet a girl IRL and get to know her, she may turn out to be the same way.

so maybe ALL women deserve ridicule? or, alternately, none of them do, because that's just the way women are?


most girls have plenty of options in real life, so why go on a dating site? well, because you are either abnormally picky and superficial, or some other problem that stops you functioning as well as you want in real life. so, most girls on dating sites tend to be abnormally unappealing (i.e the sexual value of the average male, hence on the site for similar reasons), abnormally picky, have social anxiety, or want an ego boost.
not really representative of the average girl. it should be noted that while most girls are not as extreme in their exhibition of behaviour as the super-hypergamous dating site ones, an overall trend towards that direction has been in effect since feminism arose, accelerating recently due to the degradation of pop culture etc.

what constitutes the western stereotype of a girl these days deserves ridicule, but it's best to take them as a case-by-case basis in real life. more info on my opinion related to this:
http://www.love-shy.com/lsbb/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15604&p=301626#p301626

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank Fonduman for the above post:
Stranger1983
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 26 May 2012, 23:16 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2012, 00:24
Posts: 395
Thanks: 100
Thanked:
71 times in 54 posts
It's not so much the way they look. Most of their photos are so piss poor anyway you can't tell what they look like, but it's what they write which is so disparaging. They have such a dull and prosaic outlook. They are so unfathomably boring. I guess they're on there because they're dateless and can't get friends either. What they seek is so painfully unreasonable not even the Prince watsit of watsit would be able to impress them. In fact that is probably the only person who could pique their interest; the Prince of Watsit.

There is something depressing about looking through all those profiles and finding how samey and spammy they all are.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 27 May 2012, 00:11 
Offline
New Poster
User avatar

Joined: 07 May 2012, 05:54
Posts: 28
Location: USA
3 times in 3 posts
Fonduman wrote:
shadowshelf wrote:

this seems like a thorough and educated response.

however... isn't it safe to assume that the girls on dating sites represent an accurate sample of women IRL? in other words, if the women in this microcosm don't exhibit humility, altruism, or empathy, how can we assume that offline women do? maybe these girls are just more open about it... when you meet a girl IRL and get to know her, she may turn out to be the same way.

so maybe ALL women deserve ridicule? or, alternately, none of them do, because that's just the way women are?


most girls have plenty of options in real life, so why go on a dating site? well, because you are either abnormally picky and superficial, or some other problem that stops you functioning as well as you want in real life. so, most girls on dating sites tend to be abnormally unappealing (i.e the sexual value of the average male, hence on the site for similar reasons), abnormally picky, have social anxiety, or want an ego boost.
not really representative of the average girl. it should be noted that while most girls are not as extreme in their exhibition of behaviour as the super-hypergamous dating site ones, an overall trend towards that direction has been in effect since feminism arose, accelerating recently due to the degradation of pop culture etc.

what constitutes the western stereotype of a girl these days deserves ridicule, but it's best to take them as a case-by-case basis in real life. more info on my opinion related to this:
http://www.love-shy.com/lsbb/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15604&p=301626#p301626


I don't have enough posts to read the other thread, but a quick question: do you spend a lot of time around women IRL?

it seems to me that the average woman IS about as "super-hypergamous" as she can be.

Rudeboy41 wrote:
It's not so much the way they look. Most of their photos are so piss poor anyway you can't tell what they look like, but it's what they write which is so disparaging. They have such a dull and prosaic outlook. They are so unfathomably boring. I guess they're on there because they're dateless and can't get friends either. What they seek is so painfully unreasonable not even the Prince watsit of watsit would be able to impress them. In fact that is probably the only person who could pique their interest; the Prince of Watsit.


if we could get every man to "go on strike" we might be able to change these women... but how can we all unify?

_________________
"I could have been wild, and I could have been free, but nature played this trick on me..."


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 27 May 2012, 00:15 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7544
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 548
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
shadowshelf wrote:
Fonduman wrote:
shadowshelf wrote:

this seems like a thorough and educated response.

however... isn't it safe to assume that the girls on dating sites represent an accurate sample of women IRL? in other words, if the women in this microcosm don't exhibit humility, altruism, or empathy, how can we assume that offline women do? maybe these girls are just more open about it... when you meet a girl IRL and get to know her, she may turn out to be the same way.

so maybe ALL women deserve ridicule? or, alternately, none of them do, because that's just the way women are?


most girls have plenty of options in real life, so why go on a dating site? well, because you are either abnormally picky and superficial, or some other problem that stops you functioning as well as you want in real life. so, most girls on dating sites tend to be abnormally unappealing (i.e the sexual value of the average male, hence on the site for similar reasons), abnormally picky, have social anxiety, or want an ego boost.
not really representative of the average girl. it should be noted that while most girls are not as extreme in their exhibition of behaviour as the super-hypergamous dating site ones, an overall trend towards that direction has been in effect since feminism arose, accelerating recently due to the degradation of pop culture etc.

what constitutes the western stereotype of a girl these days deserves ridicule, but it's best to take them as a case-by-case basis in real life. more info on my opinion related to this:
http://www.love-shy.com/lsbb/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=15604&p=301626#p301626


I don't have enough posts to read the other thread, but a quick question: do you spend a lot of time around women IRL?

it seems to me that the average woman IS about as "super-hypergamous" as she can be.



I tend to associate in conditions that would lead to more reasonable girls. Like on my physics course for example, or at the local geek club.
I do wish sometimes I had a little more practical experience. It's hard to know what girls all around you are thinking, what their attitudes are in general, when you're too LS to consider talking to them.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 27 May 2012, 23:46 
Offline
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 18 Aug 2009, 04:23
Posts: 2614
Thanks: 526
Thanked:
401 times in 266 posts
Looks like e-harmony is having a special this weekend. I saw this ad on facebook
Attachment:
eharmony.PNG


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 28 May 2012, 18:19 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 20:16
Posts: 2
Location: USA, Michigan
Stranger1983 wrote:
So a while back I was talking with a female friend of mine who told me she found her boyfriend by using Okcupid.com. I've tried internet dating before, e-harmony and match.com. even went so far as Craigslist personals. Needless to say, none of these endevours reaped me anything close to a fruitfull experience. So when I was assured that I should give it a shot because Ok cupid is WAYY BETTER than anything else, and its free, I figured what the hell.

Its been about a week since I opened up an account, all I've really been doing is answering the most ridiculous questions, and being offered "matches" that I dont think I'd like very much. I'll certainly give it some time because I really have nothing to lose, but allready I'm feeling dissapointed by it. Seems like the women (girls) on this site are fat, bisexual attention whores, or ultra liberal femme-tards.

Anyways, just curious if anyone else has used this service, any luck as far as actually getting a response and going on a date? Any other insight?


Just replying to the OP, there's already tons of good discussion here, so some of this might be redundant.

I recently signed up for OK Cupid, I thought that the quizzes were interesting, but after a while I got a bit suspicious. It feels like I'm taking the Scientology Oxford Personality Test, or something. Furthermore, matching me up with someone depending on a bunch of survey questions seems to be a load of BS to me. Users can easily exploit this kind of a questionnaire.

In the past, I got one date from an online dating service, I forgot the name of it and it was years ago. So far, no success with this service. Not even a reply, but lots of "snow cows", as we call them here, have certainly looked at my profile. Most of these women seem to be in search of a certain income, as someone here mentioned, and I'm not willing to let total strangers in on those details. With that in mind, it may be more economically sensible for me to just hire a whore, cheaper and more professional.

This is also my first post here. Hello. So far, I've really enjoyed the insight that you folks have been posting here.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 29 May 2012, 04:02 
Online
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 17:21
Posts: 2291
Location: Where All the Freaks of Nature Are
Thanks: 121
Thanked:
444 times in 309 posts
Highscores: 1
Sometimes I wish dearly on OKCupid (or any other dating site for that matter), you could just type in "good, decent girl", and it would do so. Apparently it is too advanced an algorithm...

_________________
"Natalie Portman, a woman for whom almost every teenager in the universe would take a lightsaber to the privates to just to have a chance to be near."--Robbie Boland, IGN Freelance Copywriter


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 30 May 2012, 02:15 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2012, 00:24
Posts: 395
Thanks: 100
Thanked:
71 times in 54 posts
allfrets wrote:
Stranger1983 wrote:
So a while back I was talking with a female friend of mine who told me she found her boyfriend by using Okcupid.com. I've tried internet dating before, e-harmony and match.com. even went so far as Craigslist personals. Needless to say, none of these endevours reaped me anything close to a fruitfull experience. So when I was assured that I should give it a shot because Ok cupid is WAYY BETTER than anything else, and its free, I figured what the hell.

Its been about a week since I opened up an account, all I've really been doing is answering the most ridiculous questions, and being offered "matches" that I dont think I'd like very much. I'll certainly give it some time because I really have nothing to lose, but allready I'm feeling dissapointed by it. Seems like the women (girls) on this site are fat, bisexual attention whores, or ultra liberal femme-tards.

Anyways, just curious if anyone else has used this service, any luck as far as actually getting a response and going on a date? Any other insight?


Just replying to the OP, there's already tons of good discussion here, so some of this might be redundant.

I recently signed up for OK Cupid, I thought that the quizzes were interesting, but after a while I got a bit suspicious. It feels like I'm taking the Scientology Oxford Personality Test, or something. Furthermore, matching me up with someone depending on a bunch of survey questions seems to be a load of BS to me. Users can easily exploit this kind of a questionnaire.

In the past, I got one date from an online dating service, I forgot the name of it and it was years ago. So far, no success with this service. Not even a reply, but lots of "snow cows", as we call them here, have certainly looked at my profile. Most of these women seem to be in search of a certain income, as someone here mentioned, and I'm not willing to let total strangers in on those details. With that in mind, it may be more economically sensible for me to just hire a whore, cheaper and more professional.

This is also my first post here. Hello. So far, I've really enjoyed the insight that you folks have been posting here.



Snow cow - I like the term. What I find most disturbing about these dating sites is that you see a thumbnail of a pretty face, then you click on her profile and then you look at her other pictures and you realise she's been posting pictures of how she looked when she was younger. She's placed the photo of when she was younger next to the more recent one, and like, can you tell the difference??? Hell yeah.

And I'm thinking holy struth. What happened? Which reactor did she stumble into to? How did she get like that? It's disturbing. Maybe the wise stick with whores huh?

I think we should post up an advice page for young women. Try to warn them that their looks are not permanent, and they should really check out a guy before jumping in at the deep end. If they get a good man, their looks will last longer due to less stress from the absence of beatings and general abuse comonly found in joe average alpha.

Welcom to the forum BTW. I've only been here a month or so.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 30 May 2012, 02:29 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2012, 00:24
Posts: 395
Thanks: 100
Thanked:
71 times in 54 posts
James_Young wrote:
Sometimes I wish dearly on OKCupid (or any other dating site for that matter), you could just type in "good, decent girl", and it would do so. Apparently it is too advanced an algorithm...


I think even if there was a button with "good, decent girl" on it, the screen would only show up blank. If a girl is good and decent, she probably doesn't need to go on OKstupid. At the end of the day a girl can walk into a pub / bar with a couple of friends, or go to a football match, etc, and someone they will meet because blokes are easier for women to find than women are for blokes to find, because women have a way of getting around town to where they've got to be without giving men the chance to meet her.

The reason, well you can blame Joe Alpha Average Dumbschmuck who allways barges in on conversations screaming like a gorilla so that the shyer males flee in one direction and the female is either cought up and smothered in his slimegrease or she manages an exit, never to return to that place you visit again. Or if she does, it's with HIM.

Wherever you go there is allways a Joe Alpha Dumbschmuck to fuck it up for one. There's a really good George Carlin sketch in When will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops, along this theme about how everything was going really well till the gorilla showed up. Story of my life that one. Always a gorilla on the loose.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 30 May 2012, 03:03 
Offline
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2011, 15:56
Posts: 4723
Thanks: 312
Thanked:
602 times in 450 posts
Stay away from OkCupid if you can help it. It's a cesspool of epic fail proportions. My top 10 "matches" are a joke.

A lot of the girls are like this one:


If you're not attractive and don't indicate that you make $50K or above, don't even expect a response back when you message them.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 03 Jun 2012, 21:39 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2010, 04:49
Posts: 338
Location: Canada
Thanks: 19
Thanked:
48 times in 39 posts
The problem with online dating sites especially okcupid is that everyone is doing this:


_________________
"Life sucks and then you die"

Being normal is for freaks.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank bushes289 for the above post:
Fonduman, Small Pink Blob
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 03 Jun 2012, 22:01 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2012, 00:24
Posts: 395
Thanks: 100
Thanked:
71 times in 54 posts
Women are fundamentaly cowards.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank Rudeboy41 for the above post:
ShiningMachine2
 Post subject: Re: Okcupid
PostPosted: 04 Jun 2012, 20:29 
Offline
New Poster

Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 19:50
Posts: 19
Thanks: 2
Thanked:
1 time in 1 post
Rudeboy41 wrote:
Women are fundamentaly cowards.

Exactly


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group