LS.com homepage  •   LS.com FAQ  •   Resources
In the media  •   Articles  •   WIKI
It is currently 19 May 2013, 11:03

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


This is the one of the guest-viewable discussion areas. If you haven't already, sign up as a user (everything is, and always will be, completely free)! Users can engage in discussion in both guest-viewable and member-only subforums. There's also an arcade.

Please post in good faith. We support freedom of speech here but deliberately inflammatory posts will be deleted. Use common sense when writing posts and be sure to read the guidelines (and weep) before posting.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 15:13 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2011, 21:39
Posts: 337
Location: Eastern Europe a.k.a. craphole
Thanks: 16
Thanked:
39 times in 32 posts
No, really, they exist!
http://antisex.info/en/index.html
:crazy:
I still don't get whether most of their members are asexuals or LS/incel.
Oh well, you can never know what kind of movements people create. :?
I wonder, would this community be of any use to our members? Definitely not for me, since I am a goddamn perv! :rofl:

_________________
They can not defend themselves. They can not run away. INSANITY is their only way of escape.
All opponents to humane attitude must be shot on the spot!
You know, to kill is bad! I read that in a book!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 15:30 
Offline
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 17:50
Posts: 3137
Location: Citadel of the Time-Lords, Gallifrey
Thanks: 178
Thanked:
213 times in 153 posts
I read a bit of that site and they seem insane! They even use the word propaganda to describe their work. And nothing, NOTHING can ever be taken seriously if it is propaganda. These basically seem like a load of people who have been hurt by sex, have never had it and are jealous, or misguided fools who believe all this crap.

_________________
Image

Quote:
Allons-y!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 18:29 
Offline
Super Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 19:32
Posts: 1017
Location: outside the femisphere
Thanks: 121
Thanked:
105 times in 76 posts
A very interesting find, IY. I'd join them if I can. They might come off as too extreme, but a lot of their arguments are spot-on. I also believe that sex in itself is the cause of too many woes across the world and abstinence is often the most reasonable option.

The Doctor wrote:
They even use the word propaganda to describe their work.
Remember that English is not their first language. I don't know about Russian but in Polish there's a very similar word which basically means "to spread, disseminate" and actually has little to do with propaganda.

Also, IY, if you boast so much of being a perv, then I wonder if you're LS/incel at all.

_________________
I'm so mad at big government!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 18:51 
Offline
Natural Born Pussy Magnet + Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 18:52
Posts: 3960
Thanks: 492
Thanked:
524 times in 350 posts
Well, it's quite an extreme point of view. It is, though, quite a refreshing change from all the "sex-positive" propaganda around that tells people that anything they do is okay as long as it's consensual. I don't think sex is a direct cause of misfortunes, but like money, it routinely motivates a lot of people to do horrible things. Still, a sex-neutrality movement would probably make more sense. Too bad neutrality isn't newsworthy.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 19:38 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 16:29
Posts: 655
Thanks: 246
Thanked:
173 times in 106 posts
I do not believe in telling others how/when/where/with-whom to have sex. However, I do agree with the assertion that people should strive to control their sexual urges, and treat it as somthing more than a bodily function to be reserved for those they have a deeper connection with.

_________________
But I adore her
this will never happen
but I adore HER
this will NEVER happen
over my DEAD body
of course I think ABOUT it
burn my path if it does


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank Stranger1983 for the above post:
Odalis
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 19:47 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7541
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 547
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
sex is the problem only to the extent that eating is the source of obesity...
time to stop eating?

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank Fonduman for the above post:
The Doctor
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 20:16 
Offline
Super Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2010, 23:34
Posts: 1155
Location: Europe
Thanks: 187
Thanked:
212 times in 141 posts
Small Pink Blob wrote:
Still, a sex-neutrality movement would probably make more sense. Too bad neutrality isn't newsworthy.


Or something along the lines of responsible sexuality, for yourself and others.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 20:50 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007, 22:56
Posts: 5934
Location: the land of the fee & the home of the slave
Thanks: 1286
Thanked:
1204 times in 735 posts
Anti-sexuality in the sense of trying to pass laws to prohibit people from having sex (or even limiting their choices) = very bad. Prohibition never works... and always makes things ten times worse. Always.

Educating people of the damage that runaway hypersexuality has caused and is causing so they can hopefully make the choice to avoid irresponsible sex = very good idea.
If someone wants to call that anti-sexuality, then so be it.

_________________
“Be good and you will be lonesome.”
~Samuel Clemens, AKA Mark Twain

“Be lonesome and you will be free.”
~Jimmy Buffet

“I'd rather be hated for who I am than loved for who I am not.”
~Kurt Cobain

“Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves.
All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”

~George Bernard Shaw


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 20:55 
Offline
Super Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 19:32
Posts: 1017
Location: outside the femisphere
Thanks: 121
Thanked:
105 times in 76 posts
Small Pink Blob wrote:
Still, a sex-neutrality movement would probably make more sense. Too bad neutrality isn't newsworthy.
Sex-neutrality movements already exist, the asexual community is probably the most widely known example. I think it's anti-sex movements that are actually refreshing and necessary for this spoilt society.

Fonduman wrote:
sex is the problem only to the extent that eating is the source of obesity...
No. People who gorge themselves to the point of obesity are only responsible for themselves, and nobody else. If an obesity-associated disease occurs to them, they would have virtually brought it upon themselves. But people obsessed with sex who eagerly engage in promiscuous behaviour are also responsible for others - there's always a risk of pregnancy, STDs and - last but not least - sex always requires at least two people. It simply takes two to tango, not to mention group sex and other filthy deviations.
Another thing, there is no pro-eating propaganda out there. Quite the contrary, the media encourage people to live a healthy lifestyle, if possible. There are fast foods and other shit, but it's irrelevant anyway. What matters is that no one is brainwashed enough to feel "empowered" because of eating more than others, and those who eat less don't get shamed for no apparent reason.

_________________
I'm so mad at big government!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 20:58 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7541
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 547
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
Malady wrote:
Small Pink Blob wrote:
Still, a sex-neutrality movement would probably make more sense. Too bad neutrality isn't newsworthy.
Sex-neutrality movements already exist, the asexual community is probably the most widely known example. I think it's anti-sex movements that are actually refreshing and necessary for this spoilt society.

Fonduman wrote:
sex is the problem only to the extent that eating is the source of obesity...
No. People who gorge themselves to the point of obesity are only responsible for themselves, and nobody else. If an obesity-associated disease occurs to them, they would have virtually brought it upon themselves. But people obsessed with sex who eagerly engage in promiscuous behaviour are also responsible for others - there's always a risk of pregnancy, STDs and - last but not least - sex always requires at least two people. It simply takes two to tango, not to mention group sex and other filthy deviations.
Another thing, there is no pro-eating propaganda out there. Quite the contrary, the media encourage people to live a healthy lifestyle, if possible. There are fast foods and other shit, but it's irrelevant anyway. What matters is that no one is brainwashed enough to feel "empowered" because of eating more than others, and those who eat less don't get shamed for no apparent reason.


ok, so analogy doesn't stretch to every conceivable property of it.
my point was that these things only become a problem when they are abused. sex isn't the problem. food isn't the problem. people are the problem.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 21:12 
Offline
Super Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 19:32
Posts: 1017
Location: outside the femisphere
Thanks: 121
Thanked:
105 times in 76 posts
Fonduman wrote:
my point was that these things only become a problem when they are abused. sex isn't the problem. food isn't the problem. people are the problem.
I agree, but I must admit I've grown much less liberal in the course of time. Sex is too much of a difficult matter to let people abuse it whenever they want to. You can always bring up freedom of choice and so on, but given that the majority of folks are nowhere near tolerant of those who don't have sex, I'm dubious if there actually is any freedom we can talk about... It's always the haves who can openly abuse the have-nots in the name of so-called freedom...

loveablenerd wrote:
Prohibition never works... and always makes things ten times worse. Always.
I disagree.

_________________
I'm so mad at big government!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 21:30 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7541
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 547
Thanked:
944 times in 681 posts
Malady wrote:
Fonduman wrote:
my point was that these things only become a problem when they are abused. sex isn't the problem. food isn't the problem. people are the problem.
I agree, but I must admit I've grown much less liberal in the course of time. Sex is too much of a difficult matter to let people abuse it whenever they want to. You can always bring up freedom of choice and so on, but given that the majority of folks are nowhere near tolerant of those who don't have sex, I'm dubious if there actually is any freedom we can talk about... It's always the haves who can openly abuse the have-nots in the name of so-called freedom...


so, you're saying that people can't be trusted to utilise these things responsibly? Because that kinda confirms my point.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 21:34 
Offline
Poster
User avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2011, 21:39
Posts: 337
Location: Eastern Europe a.k.a. craphole
Thanks: 16
Thanked:
39 times in 32 posts
Malady wrote:
Also, IY, if you boast so much of being a perv, then I wonder if you're LS/incel at all.


Of course, I am an LS/incel. By 'perv', I mean my inner desires and 'naughty-naughty-naughty' thoughts which only get executed in the real world very discreetly and privately. I am not too shy to write a porn story, but too skillless/shy to make it real. At least I try not to be seen. :mrgreen: So far: attempted nude walk in park, a couple of visits to the pay-per-visit ladies, semi-public place masturbation, some gigabytes of peculiar non-conventional (still legal!) pr0n, some tsk-tsk-tsk 'bad-behaved boy' touches of familiar girls. Nothing special. Still no real love, no real sex, no real relationships. Typical.

Also, I wonder, why such a term as 'anti-sex' is only well-known in Russia or thereabouts? I guess it is because the movement originated here, and never was known in the west at all. So I guess, not all popular streams of thoughts in the last 2 decades in ex-USSR were copied from the west (such as LGBT, feminism, liberalism, new age, etc, etc, etc in every aspect of life); some are born on the place itself. :rofl: My guess it is a reaction to radically changed lifestyle after the breakup in early 1990s - previously in USSR there was 'no sex'! (in the media, that is) :rofl:

_________________
They can not defend themselves. They can not run away. INSANITY is their only way of escape.
All opponents to humane attitude must be shot on the spot!
You know, to kill is bad! I read that in a book!


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 21:34 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2007, 22:56
Posts: 5934
Location: the land of the fee & the home of the slave
Thanks: 1286
Thanked:
1204 times in 735 posts
Malady wrote:
loveablenerd wrote:
Prohibition never works... and always makes things ten times worse. Always.
I disagree.

Fair enough....

Give me one example in history where it actually worked.

_________________
“Be good and you will be lonesome.”
~Samuel Clemens, AKA Mark Twain

“Be lonesome and you will be free.”
~Jimmy Buffet

“I'd rather be hated for who I am than loved for who I am not.”
~Kurt Cobain

“Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves.
All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”

~George Bernard Shaw


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 21 May 2012, 21:49 
Offline
Natural Born Pussy Magnet + Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 18 Jan 2011, 18:52
Posts: 3960
Thanks: 492
Thanked:
524 times in 350 posts
Malady wrote:
Small Pink Blob wrote:
Still, a sex-neutrality movement would probably make more sense. Too bad neutrality isn't newsworthy.
Sex-neutrality movements already exist, the asexual community is probably the most widely known example. I think it's anti-sex movements that are actually refreshing and necessary for this spoilt society.

How much time have you spent in the asexual community? At least from what I know of AVEN, sex-positivity is the officially enforced norm. Asexuality is obviously defended as valid and good, but so is every expression of sexuality. There's barely any talk about responsibility and morals. True, it's a lot richer and less relativistic than the social justice movement, but you still can't say things like "the number of sexual partners a person has had is relevant" or "promiscuity can be damaging at the social and individual level" without getting accused of "slut-shaming" and policing people's sex lives.

Malady wrote:
Another thing, there is no pro-eating propaganda out there. Quite the contrary, the media encourage people to live a healthy lifestyle, if possible. There are fast foods and other shit, but it's irrelevant anyway. What matters is that no one is brainwashed enough to feel "empowered" because of eating more than others, and those who eat less don't get shamed for no apparent reason.

I partly agree with your point; it's true that eating excessively is not seen as something to take pride upon by society at large, and "body acceptance" movements usually only have an effect at the individual or small scale level. However, there is quite a lot of eating propaganda in the form of fast food advertising, and judging by the results, it's not irrelevant in the slightest. You can't go out on Valentine's day without being guilt tripped into buying chocolates, for example.

Recently my country (which has a high child obesity rate) took a stand, by banning the sale of fast food snacks in elementary schools, and forcing manufacturers to label their products more clearly. Getting back to the point, it's still ironic that if you watch the food you put in your body, you're seen as irresponsible, but if you take the same approach to sexuality, no one has the "right" to criticize you.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group