Recently, the Boy Scouts of America dismissed a women who was a leader in a Cub Scout Den because she was a "lesbian" and open about it, and after she was removed is now going to "sue" the Boy Scouts for discrimination against "gays and lesbians"

She would paint her fiingernails and toenails with the "rainbow" flag and explain to YOUNG boys (ages 5 to eight) about her sexuality. She claims she loves the "Scouts" but this policy needs to be changed

As a Scout leader:

This policy and guidelines for leadership have been in place in the USA since 1913. Scouts arrived in the USA in 1910 from the UK.

FIRST: A Scout is Honest and Truthful

(In the application for becoming a Scout Leader it CLEARLY states that drug users, convicted felons, persons under "Megan's Law" and homosexuals are not allowed to be Scout Leaders)

She "lied" on her application, and that is a grounds for dismissal right there.

SECOND: Her sexuality IS her identity. She has made it an issue to YOUNG BOYS. Let's remember this. LITTLE BOYS. That has no place in a Scout meeting, at THAT age to young people. It's not being a prude, or old fashioned. Your sexual identity has NO place in a meeting for CUB SCOUTS at that age.

THIRD: If she really loves the Scouts and she wants her son involved in them. FINE. Find a troop, and enroll him in that troop. This is an agenda on her part.

LASTLY

Thank you Boy Scouts of America for STANDING by your decision despite media pressue, despite attacks, and smearing. There are plenty of LGBT organizations I CANNOT join because I am straight.

This happened in south park.

I've been meaning to ask you about this topic but didn't want to bring it up. So is the lesbian allowed in in the first place soly by proclamation of being a lesbian because I thought Boy Scouts were for boys and Girl Scouts, joke of an equivalent as it is, was for girls.

Those are some pretty archaic rules. I'm surprised the no homos rule is even legally enforcible.

aparently they aren't. Sexually confused doesn't equal man child.

I'd like to kick her skanky lesbian ass right now. Women were NOT allowed in Boy Scouts when I was a lad, only
den mothers for Cub Scouts and the women would have ran this bitch out of town on a rail back then.

Boys are very impressionable at that age, which is why many of us became love-shy. Boot her ass out
of court!!!!

If not, a few heavy stones, some rope and a rowboat to drop her sorry lesbo ass in a cold lake would be justice done.

No they are not archaic. They are correct. And the homos have been fighting to be included in the BSA for years.

Fuck that nonsense!!!!

If you want to see what homosexuals do to an organization, you need look no further then the Catholic Church,
which is chock full of child-molesting priests.

The day the BSA allows openly "gay and lesbian" leaders, is the day I hang up my uniform, and I will resign by ltter explaining "WHY" I am leaving, so there is no "misconception" about it.

Odalis. Women are allowed to be leaders in the Scouts today...and THIS is the fault of MEN, let me tell you WHY it is:

Too many men today DON'T DO ANYTHING. Scouts is in a DEARTH of lacking GOOD, HARDWORKING men to lead the troops, and the BSA in general. Too many men are just plain lazy (the Homer Simpson attitude of "let someone else do it") many men find the organiztion "boring" (If hot chicks are not in it, I don't want any part of it)

and many men have never been in Scouts period and have little or NO UNDERSTANDING of what it exactly is, and probably feel a bit "intimidated" by the "clubbieness" of it...like it is for some guys and not others. This IS Scoutings fault. The BSA needs to be taking this issue HEAD-ON and letting men know that they CAn lead, and GROW, and learn something about themselves...even if they don't have a son, or a son who is of scouting age, or doesn't even have children. Scouting needs to let MEN know...there is a place for them here.

Pedophilia is not homosexuality.

No pacman it is not. That is a TRUE statement.

It's a private organization. Why shouldn't they be allowed to exclude fags?

It's selective nature....for example...al the mens' colleges and universities were FORCED to go co-ed in the mid 1970's (Dartmouth being the last Ivy to do so). EVEN private ONES.

Womens' colleges were NOT FORCED to go co-ed. They had a "choice" to go coed or not.

My own undergrad was a womens' college until 1985...and the only reason it went co-ed because it was going broke!

An organization being "private" won't protect it today.

It has protected the Boy Scouts so far. You think this is the first time they've gone to court over this?

Also: If all men's colleges were forced to go co-ed in the 1970s, then why are there still many men-only colleges in the U.S.? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_co ... ted_States

Those colleges are for training men for the priesthood, for Rabbinical studies......

"church training or temple training colleges, seminary based"

Where is a traditional "liberal arts college or university" that is still all men? There are none. All were forced to go co-ed.

I'm just wondering how come I see gay agenda writings about this poor little sexually confused boy or girl feels "different" in the club and first, how are they in there in the first place. When I was a child my parents forced me to be in Girl Scouts. It was horrible. All they did was lock us up in public buildings over nights, with all those devil children. My ability to interact with others was probably severely damaged by no lack of contribution from years of these experiences. Our troop never did anything. But we meet too many times for my liking. Activities generally involved the troop spending the night at the club leader's child's house, who obviously ran the small show. No body liked me. They excluded me but I wasn't still not allowed to simply be gone.

Then my little brother comes of age and goes to Boy Scouts. The few times I saw there activities, they looked way more interesting than any of the do nothing we did. My brother got to make a little car any way he liked, which meant that dad showed him how to use tools and involve him in building his little drag race car. My brother though, wasn't interested in any of it. I would have rather been in a group like that. At least activities would hold some meaning.

Which is another reason I don't like the gay agenda trying to meddle in everything. Tomboy's are not confused. We never once thought we were anything but little girls, who just happened to think what the boys were doing was more interesting and made the choice to choose companions befitting interests, accepting whatever consequences came with that including ostracization from both groups, for the small percent of real friendships made.